Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cherry-Pick DYN-6769 Improving Dynamo Load Graph II (#15108) #15125

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2024

Conversation

RobertGlobant20
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

Cherry-Pick DYN-6769 Improving Dynamo Load Graph II (#15108)

Declarations

Check these if you believe they are true

  • The codebase is in a better state after this PR
  • Is documented according to the standards
  • The level of testing this PR includes is appropriate
  • User facing strings, if any, are extracted into *.resx files
  • All tests pass using the self-service CI.
  • Snapshot of UI changes, if any.
  • Changes to the API follow Semantic Versioning and are documented in the API Changes document.
  • This PR modifies some build requirements and the readme is updated
  • This PR contains no files larger than 50 MB

Release Notes

Cherry-Pick DYN-6769 Improving Dynamo Load Graph II (#15108)

Reviewers

@QilongTang

FYIs

* DYN-6769 Improving Dynamo Load Graph

With this change only will be executing the DefaultAutocompleteCandidates functionality only once at Dynamo startup and when a graph is loaded won't be executed anymore.

* DYN-6769 Improving Dynamo Load Graph

With this change only will be executing the DefaultAutocompleteCandidates functionality only once at Dynamo startup and when a graph is loaded won't be executed anymore.
Copy link

UI Smoke Tests

Test: success. 2 passed, 0 failed.
TestComplete Test Result
Workflow Run: UI Smoke Tests
Check: UI Smoke Tests - net8.0

@QilongTang QilongTang merged commit c9bf6f6 into DynamoDS:RC3.1.0_master Apr 14, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
@QilongTang QilongTang added this to the 3.1 milestone Apr 14, 2024
QilongTang added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants